When Roger Federer SURVIVED 4 Match Points 🤯 | Paris 2003 Match Highlights
When Roger Federer SURVIVED 4 Match Points 🤯 | Paris 2003 Match Highlights
Advertisement

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

LATEST COMMENTS

@davidbreitkopf3603 Says:
It's fun to watch these matches, to discover, even. within Roger's career, that his game got measurably better. But it seems unfair to Martin Verkerk to not even give him a name in the match, or drop it somewhere in the description or even an early comment. Guy played a great match, and yet he's nobody to whomever posted this. This happens all the time with these types of videos.
@briandtnguyen Says:
Is it just me or is old 2017 Federer somehow superior to 2004 Federer?
@RazOls Says:
Thanks for bringing this match in HD quality. A joy for all Fed fans out there
@bcthomps Says:
Please do a full weeks highlight review of Tim Henman’s title winning run here in ‘03. One of the greatest ever stories of this tournaments history…
@TvRF20 Says:
This video proves how much framerate helps watchability for older matches
@alburaq3290 Says:
When I watch these older matches I see a stark difference in power. Athletes hit way harder nowadays. Sinner and Alcaraz pummel the ball like anything.
@azoleyehirooni11 Says:
This was an intriguing match to watch between 2 one-handed backhands and featuring so much serve and volley, thank you for sharing! I feel like Federer a year later would have destroyed Verkerk in straight sets and 2006 version of Fed might have double bageled him like Gaston Gaudio!
@bradleydavis9502 Says:
Only Rog could’ve overcome this quality opponent. Incredible effort
@roter13 Says:
Anyone else miss indoor carpet?
@mauroc4741 Says:
This tournament was much more fun when it was played on indoor carpet. Nice match by Verkerk and the Maestro.
@joritmatena8778 Says:
WOW what a match from Verkerk!! He was sooooooo close at a couple of those matchpoints!
@JohnDoe-dp4kx Says:
I can't get around my head the stunning evolution of Roger...The late Roger would have executed his 2004 former self 6/1 6/1...he was not moving that well ( I mean well enough to be top 30 but not top 5 let alone GOAT status)....and he started on the pro Tour in 1999...we can think after 5 years a pro player has stabilized his game...Pistol Pete was already a monster at the age of 19...Boris Becker won Wimby at the age of 17...Alcaraz was already really impressive at a young age.what the heck happened with Roger to turn into a completely different player after 5 years on the tour? I've noticed the same thing with Lendl on the 80's. Weird stuff...
@initialize21 Says:
Federer is the best player to ever play the game. It's not even a question at this point.
@ST-xg3gy Says:
That big ole oaf had 4 match points?😮
@jovan1399 Says:
Mister 40 - 15!!!❤
@chancerobinson5112 Says:
Federer has been retired for 4 years, still the band plays on, I’m sure it helps his endorsements, while active players struggle to make ends meet.🤔
@angelatanurdzic7508 Says:
What a game! 😍
@CommanderGinyu Says:
Fraud is a shitty weak era player. Struggling against verkerk loooool
@Pro-fz5sl Says:
Wow
@Pro-fz5sl Says:
23 seconds and no views
@Pro-fz5sl Says:
Federer is cool
@Pro-fz5sl Says:
First

More Tenis Videos